businessproduct-management
Stakeholder Interview Guide
Design and conduct stakeholder interviews for requirements elicitation — with structured question frameworks, active listening techniques, assumption surfacing, and synthesis into actionable requirements.
interviewsrequirementsstakeholderselicitationdiscovery
Works well with agents
$ npx skills add The-AI-Directory-Company/(…) --skill stakeholder-interviewstakeholder-interview/
SKILL.md
Markdown
| 1 | |
| 2 | # Stakeholder Interview Guide |
| 3 | |
| 4 | ## Before you start |
| 5 | |
| 6 | Gather the following from the user: |
| 7 | |
| 8 | 1. **Who is the stakeholder?** (Name, role, department, decision-making authority) |
| 9 | 2. **What is the project or initiative?** (Brief context on what you are eliciting requirements for) |
| 10 | 3. **What do you already know?** (Existing documents, previous interviews, known constraints) |
| 11 | 4. **What is the interview goal?** (Discovery, validation, priority alignment, or constraint mapping) |
| 12 | |
| 13 | If the user says "I just need to ask some questions," push back: "What decision will this interview inform? Start there — it shapes every question you ask." |
| 14 | |
| 15 | ## Interview guide template |
| 16 | |
| 17 | ### 1. Preparation (before the interview) |
| 18 | |
| 19 | 1. Review all available documentation: project briefs, prior meeting notes, org charts, and existing requirements. |
| 20 | 2. Identify the stakeholder's likely concerns based on their role — executives care about ROI and timelines, operators care about workflows and edge cases, end users care about pain points and usability. |
| 21 | 3. Draft 8-12 questions using the core question types below. Sequence them from broad to specific. |
| 22 | 4. Prepare a one-paragraph project summary to share at the opening — the stakeholder should not have to guess why they are there. |
| 23 | 5. Write down your top 3 assumptions about this stakeholder's perspective. You will test these during the interview. |
| 24 | |
| 25 | ### 2. Opening (first 5 minutes) |
| 26 | |
| 27 | 1. Thank the stakeholder for their time. State the interview purpose in one sentence. |
| 28 | 2. Share the one-paragraph project summary. Ask: "Does this match your understanding, or would you frame it differently?" |
| 29 | 3. Set expectations: approximate duration, how their input will be used, and that there are no wrong answers. |
| 30 | 4. Ask permission to take notes or record. |
| 31 | |
| 32 | ### 3. Core questions by type |
| 33 | |
| 34 | Choose 2-3 types per interview based on your goal. Do not try to cover all four in a single session. |
| 35 | |
| 36 | #### Problem discovery |
| 37 | |
| 38 | - "What is the biggest challenge your team faces with [process/system] today?" |
| 39 | - "Walk me through what happens when [problem scenario] occurs." |
| 40 | - "If you could fix one thing about how this works today, what would it be and why?" |
| 41 | |
| 42 | #### Process mapping |
| 43 | |
| 44 | - "Describe your typical workflow from [trigger event] to [end state], step by step." |
| 45 | - "Where do handoffs happen? What information gets lost or delayed at those points?" |
| 46 | - "Which steps feel unnecessary or redundant to you?" |
| 47 | |
| 48 | #### Constraint surfacing |
| 49 | |
| 50 | - "What would make this project fail in your view?" |
| 51 | - "Are there regulatory, contractual, or policy constraints we need to respect?" |
| 52 | - "What resources — people, budget, systems — are non-negotiable versus flexible?" |
| 53 | |
| 54 | #### Priority alignment |
| 55 | |
| 56 | - "If we could only deliver three capabilities, which three matter most to you?" |
| 57 | - "How would you rank these needs: [list known requirements]? What's missing from this list?" |
| 58 | - "What would 'good enough for launch' look like versus 'ideal state'?" |
| 59 | |
| 60 | ### 4. Follow-up techniques |
| 61 | |
| 62 | Use these during the interview to go deeper. Never settle for the first answer. |
| 63 | |
| 64 | - **5 Whys**: When a stakeholder states a requirement, ask "Why is that important?" repeatedly (up to five times) until you reach the underlying need. Stop when the answer becomes a business outcome or user pain. |
| 65 | - **"Show me"**: Ask the stakeholder to demonstrate, sketch, or screen-share the current process. Observed behavior reveals requirements that verbal descriptions miss. |
| 66 | - **Silence**: After the stakeholder finishes an answer, wait 3-5 seconds before responding. People often add their most important point in the pause. |
| 67 | - **Playback**: Rephrase what you heard and ask "Did I get that right?" Misunderstandings caught mid-interview save weeks of rework. |
| 68 | |
| 69 | ### 5. Assumption surfacing |
| 70 | |
| 71 | Before closing, explicitly test your pre-written assumptions: |
| 72 | |
| 73 | 1. State each assumption plainly: "Going in, I assumed that [X]. Is that accurate?" |
| 74 | 2. Note whether the stakeholder confirms, corrects, or adds nuance. |
| 75 | 3. Ask: "What assumption do you think the project team is making that might be wrong?" |
| 76 | |
| 77 | This step catches misalignment early. Skipping it is the most common source of requirements gaps. |
| 78 | |
| 79 | ### 6. Closing (last 5 minutes) |
| 80 | |
| 81 | 1. Summarize the top 3-5 takeaways: "Here is what I heard as most important to you..." Read them back and ask for corrections. |
| 82 | 2. Ask: "Is there anything we didn't cover that you expected to discuss?" |
| 83 | 3. Confirm next steps: when they will see a summary, whether a follow-up session is needed, and who else you should talk to. |
| 84 | 4. Thank them again. Send a written summary within 24 hours. |
| 85 | |
| 86 | ### 7. Post-interview synthesis template |
| 87 | |
| 88 | Complete this within 24 hours while the conversation is fresh: |
| 89 | |
| 90 | ``` |
| 91 | Stakeholder: [Name, role] |
| 92 | Date: [Interview date] |
| 93 | Interviewer: [Your name] |
| 94 | |
| 95 | Key requirements identified: |
| 96 | 1. [Requirement] — Priority: [High/Medium/Low] — Source quote: "[verbatim]" |
| 97 | 2. ... |
| 98 | |
| 99 | Assumptions tested: |
| 100 | - [Assumption] → [Confirmed / Corrected / Nuanced] — Detail: [what changed] |
| 101 | |
| 102 | Constraints uncovered: |
| 103 | - [Constraint] — Impact: [what it rules out or limits] |
| 104 | |
| 105 | Conflicts with other stakeholders: |
| 106 | - [Stakeholder A wants X, Stakeholder B wants Y] — Resolution needed: [Yes/No] |
| 107 | |
| 108 | Open questions for follow-up: |
| 109 | - [Question] — Assigned to: [person] — Due: [date] |
| 110 | ``` |
| 111 | |
| 112 | ## Quality checklist |
| 113 | |
| 114 | Before marking the interview complete, verify: |
| 115 | |
| 116 | - [ ] You prepared questions in advance — you did not wing it |
| 117 | - [ ] The stakeholder spoke at least 70% of the time |
| 118 | - [ ] You tested at least one assumption explicitly |
| 119 | - [ ] You captured direct quotes for critical requirements, not just paraphrases |
| 120 | - [ ] You identified at least one conflict or tension with other stakeholders' input |
| 121 | - [ ] The closing summary was confirmed by the stakeholder, not just assumed accurate |
| 122 | - [ ] A written synthesis was sent within 24 hours |
| 123 | |
| 124 | ## Common mistakes |
| 125 | |
| 126 | - **Leading questions.** "Don't you think we should use a dashboard?" tells the stakeholder what you want to hear. Ask "How would you want to see this information?" instead. |
| 127 | - **Interviewing in groups when you need individual perspectives.** Group interviews produce consensus answers, not honest ones. Interview individually first, then validate in groups. |
| 128 | - **Treating requirements as final after one interview.** A single interview captures a snapshot. Requirements solidify across multiple conversations — plan for at least two rounds. |
| 129 | - **Skipping the assumption surfacing step.** Teams build on untested assumptions more often than on missing requirements. Make assumptions explicit or pay for them later. |
| 130 | - **Recording everything except decisions.** Transcripts are useful but overwhelming. Synthesize into the template above — what matters is actionable output, not raw notes. |
| 131 | - **Not asking "who else should I talk to?"** Every stakeholder knows someone you missed. This question is your best discovery tool for identifying hidden influencers. |
| 132 |